Thomas Obst
YaBB Newbies

http://vam.anest.ufl .edu/wip.html
Posts: 1
Gender:
|
Please accept the following with my hope it sheds some historical light on the "bleeding the tanks" discussion. In older generations of anesthesia gas machines (i.e., those designed with a "Fail-Safe" or OFPD mechanism but not designed with a proportioning mechanism such as a Link-25 or an ORMC), it certainly was possible to deliver 100% nitrous oxide. This error could easily occur if the cylinder's oxygen line was pressurized between the cylinder and the "Fail-Safe" of OFPD mechanism. If someone, for instance, opened and closed an oxygen tank, but did not depressurize the line, the "Fail-Safe" or OFPD device would remain in the open position thereby allowing for 100% nitrous oxide to be delivered. Remember, these machines had no proportioing mechanism as do current machines to act as a next line of defense against a hypoxic mixture. The stepped-down pressure differential between the wall and cylinder sources of oxygen did not allow for the cylinder to be depressurized without disconnecting the hose from the wall. And so, it was wise (though few people probably did it) to actually disconnect from the wall oxygen prior to checking tank pressure. Then, after bleeding the tank, one woud reconnect to the wall. (I used to teach students to always hold the wall oxygen tubing in their hand to assure I would not forget to reconnect to the wall prior to the anesthetic.) Nowadays, with the presence of our proportioning mecanisms, I believe it is not as critical to disconnect. Hope this adds some insight. Would be happy to hear other thoughts. Tom Obst
|